RSS vs Email: Its Not An Either-Or Question
No Comments →
If you’ve been getting caught up in all this talk of RSS versus email, its time to stop wondering.
Marketing Sherpa just posted a new report that stirred up the old RSS vs Email debate again. http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=2988
The report starts out by stating, "It chills our blood when we hear email marketers and publishers blithely state, "I’m thinking about switching over to RSS entirely!" Oh no. Please don’t. RSS is worthy of testing, but it’s not an email replacement and it never will be."
A report in Jupitermedia titled "E-Mail Marketing: Alive and Well" notes, "RSS won’t be immediately effective as an alternative to e-mail marketing. (But) for some companies (primarily publishers who cater to a technical audience), it’s sensible to press forward with RSS now as a supplement to e-mail marketing." http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/research:concept/1103/id=96103/
A lot of people think this debate has been going on for long enough. RSS is NOT a replacement for email. It does not (and may never) rival the marketing reach and immediacy of an email message.
Those who’ve been mourning the death of email marketing don’t seem to "get" the fact that RSS hasn’t reached the tipping point yet. More people read email than RSS feeds ? many more.
Sponsored Links


Lots of people in digital marketing are promoting the concept of tracking engagement — instead of giving credit to the last ad clicked on a Web site.
Ikea is pulling out all the interactive marketing channel stops to promote the opening of its new Brooklyn store. The campaign — aimed at getting New Yorkers to the new big box retail location in a seldom-visited area — utilizes e-mail directing recipients to play a game played both online and via mobile device.


